![]() In short, characterize Davidson’s conclusion, his argument, and any difficulties you discover there. Indicate what challenges Davidson presents for those in favor of both ordinary relativism, and some of the more sophisticated kinds of relativism he mentions and/or that you have encountered. Then outline the fundamental argument of the text, identifying as specifically as possible the strategy he develops in that argument. Remember your hypothetical attack was supposed to be imminent (in the immediate future), so longer-term proposals may not be viable for this paper.Īfter reading Donald Davidson’s “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme” (posted on our course site) identify the basic claim Davidson argues for, and the central criticism he seeks to make, in the text. Feel free to make radical proposals or even changes to existing laws, but do not make proposals that are illegal or unconstitutional (but you can propose changing a law). You can recommend a change to policy, procedure or an organizational change to how the IC (or an individual agency) supports the homeland which directly contributes to stopping a terrorist attack. Do not discuss defensive or protective measures such as increasing physical security - the thrust of your recommendations needs to be focused on domestic intelligence (that is what this class is about). Just listing what the government already does to collect and analyze and conduct law enforcement on the terrorism threat to the Homeland is not sufficient - make some original or even controversial proposals if you like. ![]() Employ all that you have learned about intelligence to support Homeland Security and feel free to express your own opinions when making recommendations for Homeland Security intelligence. ![]() (not overseas) by clearly specifying your recommendations of counter-measures to stop or interdict the terrorists here at home before the attack occurs. The focus of this paper is to address how intelligence, law enforcement, and homeland security officials from all three levels of government can prevent or disrupt this attack here in the U.S. Also, make sure your recommendations address a role for state and local agencies (as we discussed in week 4). Be original or cite ideas from others on how to adapt or reform how intelligence can better support homeland security here domestically to stop your hypothetical attack. The recommendations need to be something new or enacting a policy or procedure that is not already in place (do not describe how we already protect the homeland or discuss what current agencies do). Make sure your recommendations are focused only on what happens within the homeland as this is not a foreign policy or international relations course. Use the Organizational Profile (Red Cell paper) you prepared for your Midterm Assignment and combine it with the Progress Assignment you prepared about collecting and analyzing on that group (making all necessary changes based on instructor feedback) and melding them both into one seamless research paper that also adds a major new section to address your specific recommendations to counter your selected terrorist organization’s planned attack in the homeland. ![]() Full Spectrum Domestic Intelligence to Counter-Terrorism within the Homeland:ĭevelop a comprehensive 6-8 page paper summarizing the content and research from your first two papers, and then make at least three substantive recommendations on how to prevent or thwart your selected terrorist group from succeeding in their hypothetical attack on the United States homeland. This is essentially what you need to know to write this final paper.Ģ. For this final paper, you condense two previous papers into a single research paper and then add three substantive recommendations on how you propose that domestic intelligence can be employed more effectively to support the HSE to stop terrorist attacks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |